Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16331 - 16340 of 45847 for paternity test paper work.

WI App 23 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP547 Complete Title of ...
of the available physical evidence was tested and preserved by police. See id. at 53-54. Specifically, police did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76951 - 2010-04-27

[PDF] State v. Scott A. Unertl
. A question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. State v. Jackson, 147 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21440 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
under the “consumer expectation test” and is not relevant to the Otto 95’s safety or to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161183 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James R. Thiel
for testing, but by the end of the meeting, which included the intervention of the district attorney's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16516 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jimmie Johnson
machine and told him that the test was over. Johnson signed a polygraph examination agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5315 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jimmie Johnson
was finished, he detached Johnson from the polygraph machine and told him that the test was over. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5315 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., ¶53. “When the record shows that the witness’s credibility was adequately tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166125 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Emanuel D. Miller
. STANDARD OF REVIEW We will apply the compelling state interest/least restrictive alternative test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16894 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
an ineffective assistance claim, the defendant must satisfy a two-part test: the defendant must prove both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29129 - 2007-05-21

Frontsheet
the test for determining whether an amendment violates the separate amendment rule. Finally, in Part 3, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51544 - 2010-06-29