Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16341 - 16350 of 17244 for probate/1000.
Search results 16341 - 16350 of 17244 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
regarding Xander’s multiple violations of his conditions of probation and lack of cooperation related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393883 - 2021-07-20
regarding Xander’s multiple violations of his conditions of probation and lack of cooperation related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393883 - 2021-07-20
[PDF]
State v. Tremell Jackson
, the trial court had already recounted Jackson’s long history of probation and parole revocations, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6730 - 2017-09-20
, the trial court had already recounted Jackson’s long history of probation and parole revocations, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6730 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jesus Barbary
: three years probation for each count, concurrent, with various conditions. Barbary argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
: three years probation for each count, concurrent, with various conditions. Barbary argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
for probation. The maximum possible sentence Chanthasit could have received was forty years’ imprisonment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147444 - 2015-08-25
for probation. The maximum possible sentence Chanthasit could have received was forty years’ imprisonment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147444 - 2015-08-25
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
, was engaged to be married and cooperated with the probation agent. As we stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31
, was engaged to be married and cooperated with the probation agent. As we stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
, was engaged to be married and cooperated with the probation agent. As we stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31
, was engaged to be married and cooperated with the probation agent. As we stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of thirty years’ probation. Sentencing is a discretionary act and this court presumes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28760 - 2014-09-15
of thirty years’ probation. Sentencing is a discretionary act and this court presumes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28760 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court reasoned that probation would unduly depreciate the severity of the offenses. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32815 - 2008-05-27
, the court reasoned that probation would unduly depreciate the severity of the offenses. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32815 - 2008-05-27
State v. Van G. Norwood
for a class B felony, in whatever degree you wish, probation, stayed sentence or whatever you think fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19687 - 2005-10-27
for a class B felony, in whatever degree you wish, probation, stayed sentence or whatever you think fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19687 - 2005-10-27
State v. Ralph E. Adams
was sentenced to a two-year stayed prison term and the trial court placed him on probation for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12710 - 2005-03-31
was sentenced to a two-year stayed prison term and the trial court placed him on probation for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12710 - 2005-03-31