Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16341 - 16350 of 64216 for records.
Search results 16341 - 16350 of 64216 for records.
Rules Hearing
Supreme Court Rule 72.01 regarding record retention. FILED AUG 3, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38947 - 2009-08-02
Supreme Court Rule 72.01 regarding record retention. FILED AUG 3, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38947 - 2009-08-02
[PDF]
State v. Joshua W.
in the record. The disputed portion of the plea discussion is as follows: THE COURT: How do you plead to one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9444 - 2017-09-19
in the record. The disputed portion of the plea discussion is as follows: THE COURT: How do you plead to one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9444 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no position with respect to this appeal. Based upon our review of Griswold’s brief and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816115 - 2024-06-20
no position with respect to this appeal. Based upon our review of Griswold’s brief and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816115 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
State v. Robert J.P.
if the record reflects that the juvenile court exercised its discretion and there was a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11873 - 2017-09-21
if the record reflects that the juvenile court exercised its discretion and there was a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11873 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92657 - 2014-09-15
so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92657 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097145 - 2026-03-31
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097145 - 2026-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Schworck’s paternity action. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965700 - 2025-06-05
Schworck’s paternity action. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965700 - 2025-06-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and the record, we conclude that this matter presents an issue of arguable merit. Therefore, we reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101475 - 2017-09-21
, and the record, we conclude that this matter presents an issue of arguable merit. Therefore, we reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101475 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2021-22).1 Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876086 - 2024-11-14
(2021-22).1 Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876086 - 2024-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
as a caregiver pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 48.685(5)(br)[]5[]. No records exist for the 1981 conviction. DCF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104788 - 2013-11-25
as a caregiver pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 48.685(5)(br)[]5[]. No records exist for the 1981 conviction. DCF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104788 - 2013-11-25