Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16351 - 16360 of 82654 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
(OWI), second offense. The State lost the statutory presumption of admissibility of the breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28031 - 2007-02-06

[PDF] NOTICE
of admissibility of the breath test result due to a violation of WIS. STAT. § 343.305, the implied consent law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28031 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Plover, WI 54467 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175513 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Case of the month - February 2013
and a friend had used morphine – the drug that killed Peyton – around the time of Peyton’s death
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/feb13.pdf - 2013-02-11

State v. Henry L. Pierce
with five drug-related felonies, as a repeater. Pursuant to a plea bargain, Pierce pled no contest to one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9274 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Henry L. Pierce
Pierce with five drug-related felonies, as a repeater. Pursuant to a plea bargain, Pierce pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9274 - 2017-09-19

Village Food & Liquor Mart v. H & S Petroleum, Inc.
Village Food's motion. The court of appeals granted H & S leave to appeal the non-final order
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16420 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Village Food & Liquor Mart v. H & S Petroleum, Inc.
under this test will only have to be compared generally to past causes of action in order to invoke
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16420 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: CRAIG R. DAY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996972 - 2025-08-14

State v. Paul W. Schnelz
. 1994) (field sobriety test not always required in order to find probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11214 - 2005-03-31