Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16361 - 16370 of 30081 for de.
Search results 16361 - 16370 of 30081 for de.
John T. Morris v. Juneau County
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11354 - 2005-03-31
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11354 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 75
judgment is a question of law we review de novo, applying the same standards used by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96041 - 2014-09-15
judgment is a question of law we review de novo, applying the same standards used by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96041 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jeffrey Knight v. Milwaukee County
, Jeanne and Norris Knight [address deleted] began to assume de facto decision-making power for [Muriel K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2462 - 2017-09-19
, Jeanne and Norris Knight [address deleted] began to assume de facto decision-making power for [Muriel K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2462 - 2017-09-19
State v. John A. Lettice
double jeopardy protections apply is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Kramsvogel, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13425 - 2005-03-31
double jeopardy protections apply is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Kramsvogel, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13425 - 2005-03-31
WI App 36 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP788 Complete Title of ...
to a judgment as a matter of law.” Wis. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78323 - 2012-03-27
to a judgment as a matter of law.” Wis. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78323 - 2012-03-27
Wisconsin Gifts, Inc. v. City of Oak Creek
in the City’s favor. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24522 - 2006-03-20
in the City’s favor. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24522 - 2006-03-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
declined to conduct a Machner hearing, this court reviews de novo whether the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680158 - 2023-08-01
declined to conduct a Machner hearing, this court reviews de novo whether the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680158 - 2023-08-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. Id., ¶37. ¶21 Here, Luckett appears to argue the police acted in bad faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237280 - 2019-03-12
, which we review de novo. Id., ¶37. ¶21 Here, Luckett appears to argue the police acted in bad faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237280 - 2019-03-12
[PDF]
WI APP 21
a party has standing to seek declaratory relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135322 - 2017-09-21
a party has standing to seek declaratory relief presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135322 - 2017-09-21
James E. Vieau v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
, Hammer, Kirschling & Bartels, S.C., De Pere, and oral argument by Robert J. Janssen. For the defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24858 - 2006-04-18
, Hammer, Kirschling & Bartels, S.C., De Pere, and oral argument by Robert J. Janssen. For the defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24858 - 2006-04-18