Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16371 - 16380 of 30094 for de.
Search results 16371 - 16380 of 30094 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 9, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27095 - 2006-11-08
is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27095 - 2006-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
is sufficient to support a conviction is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100732 - 2013-09-25
is sufficient to support a conviction is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100732 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, is a question of law we review de novo. Lodl v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., 2002 WI 71, ¶17, 253 Wis. 2d 323
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231844 - 2019-01-09
, is a question of law we review de novo. Lodl v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., 2002 WI 71, ¶17, 253 Wis. 2d 323
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231844 - 2019-01-09
[PDF]
Wisconsin Gifts, Inc. v. City of Oak Creek
The trial court granted summary judgment in the City’s favor. We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24522 - 2017-09-21
The trial court granted summary judgment in the City’s favor. We review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24522 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 125
‘used as a doctor’s office’ is a matter of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo.” St
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53131 - 2011-08-21
‘used as a doctor’s office’ is a matter of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo.” St
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53131 - 2011-08-21
[PDF]
Shannon E. T. v. Alicia M. V.M.
of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶6 The resolution of the motion to dismiss here requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25288 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶6 The resolution of the motion to dismiss here requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25288 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Mettler v. Nellis, 2005 WI App 73, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101465 - 2013-08-28
judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Mettler v. Nellis, 2005 WI App 73, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101465 - 2013-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
moved for de novo review, and the circuit court held an evidentiary hearing on two separate dates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138584 - 2015-03-30
moved for de novo review, and the circuit court held an evidentiary hearing on two separate dates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138584 - 2015-03-30
[PDF]
Lafayette County Human Services v. Gary A.S.
presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2340 - 2017-09-19
presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2340 - 2017-09-19
State v. Xavier J. Rockette
that the impact of “non-disclosure of the police reports, while not meaningless, is de minimis upon the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25320 - 2006-06-27
that the impact of “non-disclosure of the police reports, while not meaningless, is de minimis upon the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25320 - 2006-06-27