Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16381 - 16390 of 29832 for des.
Search results 16381 - 16390 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The determination of counsel’s effectiveness, in contrast, is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186160 - 2017-09-21
). The determination of counsel’s effectiveness, in contrast, is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186160 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Austin J. Fox v. Catholic Knights Insurance Society
we review de novo. Tower Ins. Co. v. Chang, 230 Wis. 2d 667, 672, 601 N.W.2d 848 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4026 - 2017-09-20
we review de novo. Tower Ins. Co. v. Chang, 230 Wis. 2d 667, 672, 601 N.W.2d 848 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4026 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
was objectively biased. Whether the judge was objectively biased is a question of law, subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110156 - 2014-04-09
was objectively biased. Whether the judge was objectively biased is a question of law, subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110156 - 2014-04-09
State v. Daniel Buttner
” which we review de novo. See State v. Greenwold, 189 Wis.2d 59, 66-67, 525 N.W.2d 294, 296-97 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14237 - 2005-03-31
” which we review de novo. See State v. Greenwold, 189 Wis.2d 59, 66-67, 525 N.W.2d 294, 296-97 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14237 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert A. Mendoza
challenges is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See Three & One Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12303 - 2005-03-31
challenges is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See Three & One Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12303 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jamie L. Pennington
; however, whether a person is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19
; however, whether a person is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Julia Cole v. Yvonne L. Hubanks
not be liable to Cole, as a matter of law. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same method
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16629 - 2017-09-21
not be liable to Cole, as a matter of law. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same method
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 9
interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law that we decide de novo. Severude v. American Fam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479733 - 2022-04-11
interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law that we decide de novo. Severude v. American Fam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479733 - 2022-04-11
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Bowers
breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Howard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7476 - 2017-09-20
breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Howard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7476 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 4
“Whether an item is an ‘improvement to real property’… is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157471 - 2017-09-21
“Whether an item is an ‘improvement to real property’… is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157471 - 2017-09-21