Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16381 - 16390 of 29832 for des.
Search results 16381 - 16390 of 29832 for des.
Lois Happersett v. Dixie Bird
involves constitutional and statutory interpretation, matters which we review de novo. See Schmeling v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13430 - 2005-03-31
involves constitutional and statutory interpretation, matters which we review de novo. See Schmeling v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13430 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Post v. Schwall, 157 Wis. 2d 652, 656, 460 N.W.2d 794 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155956 - 2017-09-21
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Post v. Schwall, 157 Wis. 2d 652, 656, 460 N.W.2d 794 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155956 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. See Hamdan, 264 Wis. 2d 433, ¶19; see also State v. Cole, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81085 - 2012-04-16
a question of law that we review de novo. See Hamdan, 264 Wis. 2d 433, ¶19; see also State v. Cole, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81085 - 2012-04-16
Atlas Transit, Inc. v. Spence Korte
of the public interests for and against disclosure is a question of law to be reviewed by a court de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3523 - 2005-03-31
of the public interests for and against disclosure is a question of law to be reviewed by a court de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3523 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 18
that we review de novo. Rosario v. Acuity & Oliver Adjustment Co., 2007 WI App 194, ¶8, ___ Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31615 - 2008-02-27
that we review de novo. Rosario v. Acuity & Oliver Adjustment Co., 2007 WI App 194, ¶8, ___ Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31615 - 2008-02-27
[PDF]
WI APP 90
a combination of discretionary and de novo review because we review both the trial court’s factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180503 - 2017-09-21
a combination of discretionary and de novo review because we review both the trial court’s factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184903 - 2017-09-21
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184903 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same method as the circuit court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88090 - 2014-09-15
decisions de novo, applying the same method as the circuit court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88090 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Miguel Gallego v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
review de novo the circuit court’s dismissal of Gallego’s complaint for failure to state a claim. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20002 - 2017-09-21
review de novo the circuit court’s dismissal of Gallego’s complaint for failure to state a claim. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20002 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles A. Bell
implicate the constitutional right to confrontation, our review is de novo. Sasson, 62 F.3d at 882
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8125 - 2005-03-31
implicate the constitutional right to confrontation, our review is de novo. Sasson, 62 F.3d at 882
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8125 - 2005-03-31