Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16381 - 16390 of 68530 for did.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-day jury trial.3 Both J.M. and J.G. testified but Maghfour did not. We summarize additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=281402 - 2020-08-25

Harry T. Staver v. Milwaukee County
because it did not contain record references or citations to legal authority; (2) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21220 - 2006-03-22

Edley H. Stewart v. Farmers Insurance Group
At the time of the accident, Musial had no personal automobile insurance, as he did not have a valid driver’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21369 - 2006-02-13

[PDF] State v. Wesley Vann
assistance of counsel, and we conclude that the prosecutor did not engage in misconduct. Thus, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14223 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with P.J.J. the previous day, but he said that the sex was consensual and that he did not ejaculate. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308918 - 2020-12-01

Main Street Partners v. Kathleen Kaminski
. The Appellants never intended to, nor did they, occupy the leased premises. Instead, they leased this site so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11233 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kelley D. Avery
affirmatively, and Avery told him he did not deserve to live. Avery then told everyone to lie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13101 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daryl M. Knighten
and that the court did not take adequate steps to conceal the shackles from the jury. In State v. Grinder, 190 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11401 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
improperly denied his motion for a new trial because he did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105891 - 2013-12-26

John C. Kastor v. Roberta K. Kastor
a mechanistic approach to maintenance: that is, a straight 50-50 division of income. At trial, [Roberta] did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14368 - 2005-03-31