Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16381 - 16390 of 68337 for law.

COURT OF APPEALS
under § 980.01(6)(a). Based on Melendrez’s arguments and the case law he provides, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01

Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
Wis. 2d 396, 577 N.W.2d 813 (1998), and proceeded on an incorrect theory of law and that its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5370 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Thomas W. Harnisch and Thomas Harnisch Law Office, Neillsville
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29435 - 2007-06-18

[PDF] WI 73
: For the respondent-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Thomas W. Harnisch and Thomas Harnisch Law Office
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29435 - 2014-09-15

Quintin D. L'Minggio v. Jane Gamble
in the law and has historically been used to challenge prison disciplinary decisions. We also conclude
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16483 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to an order denying class certification as a matter of law. As a result, we reverse the class certification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691777 - 2023-08-17

[PDF] Quintin D. L'Minggio v. Jane Gamble
than habeas corpus since a writ of certiorari provides L'Minggio with an adequate remedy in the law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16483 - 2017-09-21

Linda M. Green v. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc.
supporting its request that we reverse: 1) that, as a matter of law, it is not liable to Green for what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14324 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
’ claims were, under the law, medical negligence claims governed by WIS. STAT. ch. 655. Because medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907115 - 2025-01-28

Julia M. Meyer v. Joseph D. Meyer
relevant factors, basing its award on factual errors, making an error of law, or granting an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15025 - 2005-03-31