Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16391 - 16400 of 30081 for de.
Search results 16391 - 16400 of 30081 for de.
[PDF]
The Travelers Insurance Companies v. John Keller
notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Id. ¶21 Whether WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4917 - 2017-09-19
notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Id. ¶21 Whether WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4917 - 2017-09-19
2011 WI APP 63
performance was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law which we review de novo, though we will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63073 - 2011-05-25
performance was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law which we review de novo, though we will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63073 - 2011-05-25
State v. Richard A. Lange
that we review de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis. 2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74 (Ct. App. 1992). Elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4420 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis. 2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74 (Ct. App. 1992). Elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4420 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was sufficiently supported to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a legal issue that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168244 - 2017-09-21
was sufficiently supported to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a legal issue that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168244 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Madison Metropolitan School District v. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
a de facto expulsion by unlawfully extending a suspension. We see little difference between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7763 - 2017-09-19
a de facto expulsion by unlawfully extending a suspension. We see little difference between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7763 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. ¶14 A defendant is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106926 - 2017-09-21
, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. ¶14 A defendant is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106926 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 36
. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s summary-judgment rulings, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78323 - 2014-09-15
. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s summary-judgment rulings, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. Miller v. Carroll, 2020 WI 56, ¶15, 392 Wis. 2d 49, 944 N.W.2d 542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749277 - 2024-01-09
is a question of law we review de novo. Miller v. Carroll, 2020 WI 56, ¶15, 392 Wis. 2d 49, 944 N.W.2d 542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749277 - 2024-01-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court’s ruling on summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681171 - 2023-07-20
a circuit court’s ruling on summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681171 - 2023-07-20
[PDF]
WI App 36
” this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶21. III. DISCUSSION ¶13 Although the circuit court cited multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962250 - 2025-06-25
” this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶21. III. DISCUSSION ¶13 Although the circuit court cited multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962250 - 2025-06-25