Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16391 - 16400 of 50107 for our.

State v. Damonta J. Jones
Sentencing is committed to the discretion of the trial court and our review is limited to determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18288 - 2005-05-31

COURT OF APPEALS
these are?” The Siblings’ counsel responded, “Our numbers are off then. I’m sorry, Your Honor.” ¶20 The Siblings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64151 - 2011-05-16

CA Blank Order
., 2008 WI App 159, ¶5, 314 Wis. 2d at 498, 762 N.W.2d at 125. Our review of the Record satisfies us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100492 - 2013-08-04

[PDF] Certification
so that our supreme court can resolve these important open issues of statutory interpretation
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102495 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mary Sevcik v. Secura Insurance
. 2d 65, 622 N.W.2d 457, a case that this court relied upon when reaching our previous decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24592 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
our preference merely because we might have imposed a different sentence, see Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61077 - 2011-03-14

State v. Susan M. Goetz
deceive ourselves if we believe that citizens will embrace our attempt to describe paste and declare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3814 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 18, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
additional facts as required by our discussion of the appellate issues. ¶7 The Pringles argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26832 - 2006-10-17

COURT OF APPEALS
the application of a statute to undisputed facts. As such, our standard of review is de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36301 - 2009-04-28

Victoria Black v. Metro Title, Inc.
relied upon by the trial court. Since this is de novo review, we do not have to discuss our reasons why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21394 - 2006-03-22