Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16391 - 16400 of 83855 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
an officer in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2017CF4761. On December 13, 2017, the State charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388445 - 2021-07-13

COURT OF APPEALS
searches and seizures, a law enforcement officer must reasonably suspect, in light of his or her experience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70214 - 2011-08-24

[PDF] State v. James Evans
, and that of Williams, were antagonistic. ΒΆ4 Joinder and severance of defendants in a criminal case is governed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15200 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
after a trial in the above captioned case and be in Court [in Indianapolis] at 9:00 the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26650 - 2006-10-03

County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
that the police did not have probable cause to make an arrest and therefore, the blood test was an illegal search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
. 1 This case was originally assigned to Judge William M. McMonigal. Judge McMonigal later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26650 - 2014-09-15

Aleksandras Davidovich Glikas v. Theodore C. Becker
conclude that the notice given in this case was defective, but that Glikas still must establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18683 - 2005-06-22

City of Manitowoc v. Michael L. McKenna
this statute, the role of the appellate court is to search the record for evidence to support findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2695 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Aleksandras Davidovich Glikas v. Theodore C. Becker
. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the notice given in this case was defective, but that Glikas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18683 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
an arrest and therefore, the blood test was an illegal search in violation of the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19