Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1641 - 1650 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 1641 - 1650 of 69366 for as he.
James D. Luedtke v. David H. Schwarz
, Luedtke was released on parole. One of the conditions of Luedtke’s parole was that he not “possess, own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
, Luedtke was released on parole. One of the conditions of Luedtke’s parole was that he not “possess, own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
witness was Sheriff’s Deputy Anthony Goth, the arresting officer. Goth testified that at 12:37 a.m. he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51335 - 2014-09-15
witness was Sheriff’s Deputy Anthony Goth, the arresting officer. Goth testified that at 12:37 a.m. he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51335 - 2014-09-15
State v. Travis S. Olson
to police. The State argues that because Olson was not in custody and because he never made an unequivocal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4068 - 2005-03-31
to police. The State argues that because Olson was not in custody and because he never made an unequivocal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4068 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, the arresting officer. Goth testified that at 12:37 a.m. he came upon a running vehicle sitting by the side
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51335 - 2010-06-23
, the arresting officer. Goth testified that at 12:37 a.m. he came upon a running vehicle sitting by the side
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51335 - 2010-06-23
[PDF]
State v. Travis S. Olson
was not in custody and because he never made an unequivocal request for an attorney, there was no violation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4068 - 2017-09-20
was not in custody and because he never made an unequivocal request for an attorney, there was no violation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4068 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. David Gallagher
postconviction relief. Gallagher argues that the trial court failed to determine that he understood the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4928 - 2017-09-19
postconviction relief. Gallagher argues that the trial court failed to determine that he understood the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4928 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David Gallagher
postconviction relief. Gallagher argues that the trial court failed to determine that he understood the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4527 - 2017-09-19
postconviction relief. Gallagher argues that the trial court failed to determine that he understood the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4527 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher M. Clutter
to pay child support and an order denying postconviction relief. He asks this court to exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15261 - 2005-03-31
to pay child support and an order denying postconviction relief. He asks this court to exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stephen Gray v. Allstate Insurance Company
Company based upon the jury’s determination that he was sixty percent negligent in the accident which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2111 - 2017-09-19
Company based upon the jury’s determination that he was sixty percent negligent in the accident which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2111 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Christopher M. Clutter
counts of failure to pay child support and an order denying postconviction relief. He asks this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15261 - 2017-09-21
counts of failure to pay child support and an order denying postconviction relief. He asks this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15261 - 2017-09-21