Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1641 - 1650 of 10291 for ed.
Search results 1641 - 1650 of 10291 for ed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the officer viewed an individual putting his hands in his pockets as a safety concern, she “ask[ed] him if I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304215 - 2020-11-18
the officer viewed an individual putting his hands in his pockets as a safety concern, she “ask[ed] him if I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304215 - 2020-11-18
City of Milwaukee v. Samuel L. Reed
its factual findings following the trial, specifically “infer[ed] that [Reed] did have the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13566 - 2005-03-31
its factual findings following the trial, specifically “infer[ed] that [Reed] did have the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13566 - 2005-03-31
Denise Rice v. Susan K. Koehler
not qualify as "private" communications. See McCormick on Evidence § 80, at 166 (2d ed. 1972). Brian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10510 - 2005-03-31
not qualify as "private" communications. See McCormick on Evidence § 80, at 166 (2d ed. 1972). Brian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10510 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
general issues regarding exceptions to the statute[] of frauds” and that counsel “refer[ed] generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93769 - 2013-03-06
general issues regarding exceptions to the statute[] of frauds” and that counsel “refer[ed] generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93769 - 2013-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
explained: I asked the foreperson if that is his or her verdict, and I instruct[ed] them that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213521 - 2018-05-30
explained: I asked the foreperson if that is his or her verdict, and I instruct[ed] them that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213521 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” the Foust exception, and the court “reaffirm[ed] that documents integral to the criminal investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835993 - 2024-08-08
” the Foust exception, and the court “reaffirm[ed] that documents integral to the criminal investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835993 - 2024-08-08
[PDF]
State v. Terry A. Givens
DICTIONARY 243 (6th ed. 1990), defines "circumstantial evidence" as follows: "Testimony not based on actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11264 - 2017-09-19
DICTIONARY 243 (6th ed. 1990), defines "circumstantial evidence" as follows: "Testimony not based on actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11264 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that after he “slammed on” his breaks, his “tires lock[ed] up” and his vehicle collided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171751 - 2017-09-21
testified that after he “slammed on” his breaks, his “tires lock[ed] up” and his vehicle collided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171751 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
qualities.” However, the court determined that the seriousness of the offenses “demand[ed] a serious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638662 - 2023-03-28
qualities.” However, the court determined that the seriousness of the offenses “demand[ed] a serious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638662 - 2023-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS
discovered on February 4, 2010, that his trial counsel had “fail[ed] to investigate an exculpatory witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71888 - 2011-10-11
discovered on February 4, 2010, that his trial counsel had “fail[ed] to investigate an exculpatory witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71888 - 2011-10-11