Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1641 - 1650 of 68874 for he.
Search results 1641 - 1650 of 68874 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his guilty pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because he mistakenly believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264669 - 2020-06-16
his guilty pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because he mistakenly believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264669 - 2020-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the consequences of his plea, and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to his counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131518 - 2017-09-21
the consequences of his plea, and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to his counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131518 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
hearing. Kastenschmidt testified that on February 25, 2009, he was working a traffic enforcement detail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56617 - 2014-09-15
hearing. Kastenschmidt testified that on February 25, 2009, he was working a traffic enforcement detail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56617 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel W. Harr
in which he was adjudged not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (NGI). He argues that (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11505 - 2005-03-31
in which he was adjudged not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (NGI). He argues that (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11505 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that on February 25, 2009, he was working a traffic enforcement detail on Highway 41 with another officer, Deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56617 - 2010-11-16
that on February 25, 2009, he was working a traffic enforcement detail on Highway 41 with another officer, Deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56617 - 2010-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. He argues that he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109920 - 2014-04-07
an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. He argues that he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109920 - 2014-04-07
State v. Keith R. Randolph
an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence.[1] He appears to contend that new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7020 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence.[1] He appears to contend that new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith R. Randolph
his postconviction motion to modify his sentence. 1 He appears to contend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7020 - 2017-09-20
his postconviction motion to modify his sentence. 1 He appears to contend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7020 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. George F. Passarelli
of disorderly conduct. He argues that (1) the trial court erroneously instructed the jury; (2) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13819 - 2014-09-15
of disorderly conduct. He argues that (1) the trial court erroneously instructed the jury; (2) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13819 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109920 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109920 - 2017-09-21