Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1641 - 1650 of 44714 for part.
Search results 1641 - 1650 of 44714 for part.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MAXINE A. WHITE, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80046 - 2014-09-15
an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MAXINE A. WHITE, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80046 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 254
L. BAIN, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27219 - 2014-09-15
L. BAIN, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27219 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County: maxine a. white, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80046 - 2012-03-26
for Milwaukee County: maxine a. white, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80046 - 2012-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in part and reversed in part. Before Gundrum, P.J., Neubauer and Grogan, JJ. Per curiam opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=510907 - 2022-04-20
in part and reversed in part. Before Gundrum, P.J., Neubauer and Grogan, JJ. Per curiam opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=510907 - 2022-04-20
[PDF]
Frontsheet
HAGEDORN, J., joined. ROGGENSACK, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. REBECCA
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641323 - 2023-06-19
HAGEDORN, J., joined. ROGGENSACK, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. REBECCA
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641323 - 2023-06-19
Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
-part test: (1) whether the proposed variance violates the purpose of the zoning ordinance at issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5370 - 2005-03-31
-part test: (1) whether the proposed variance violates the purpose of the zoning ordinance at issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5370 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
both set forth a two-part test: (1) whether the proposed variance violates the purpose of the zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5370 - 2017-09-19
both set forth a two-part test: (1) whether the proposed variance violates the purpose of the zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5370 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Dane County: julie genovese, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83172 - 2012-05-30
of the circuit court for Dane County: julie genovese, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83172 - 2012-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Higginbotham, Sherman and Blanchard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83172 - 2014-09-15
. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Higginbotham, Sherman and Blanchard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83172 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Section Adm 2.07(2) provided in pertinent part: Adm 2.07 Exterior and interior displays and decorations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110457 - 2014-04-16
. Section Adm 2.07(2) provided in pertinent part: Adm 2.07 Exterior and interior displays and decorations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110457 - 2014-04-16