Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1641 - 1650 of 20929 for word.

2011 WI APP 56
633, 681 N.W.2d 110. If the meaning of the words in the statute is plain and unambiguous, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61120 - 2011-04-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of the possibility of death increases, but not the words “We saved his life,” we have no intent to do that. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53413 - 2010-08-16

Julie Aasen-Robles v. Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians
of the policy “in accordance with the principle that the test is not what the insurer intended the words to mean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6429 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dennis R. Thiel
the meaning of the word “may” as used in Wis. Stat. § 980.07(1). The mere presence of the word “may” does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2156 - 2005-03-31

Richard Vultaggio v. Caryl Yasko
, that is, whether the words complained of are “reasonably capable of conveying a defamatory meaning to the ordinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2290 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI APP 177
defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning. State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29380 - 2007-07-24

[PDF] Pamela E. Rubrich v. Paul J. Piotruszewicz
and interpret it as it would be understood by a reasonable person in the insured’s position. Id. The words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4903 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Frank M. Kett
the legislature intended by the word “prevails” as it appears in the provision. If the customers have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12139 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 68
or omission.” Nowhere in the statute do the words “reasonable” or “unreasonable” appear. We may not add
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195990 - 2018-08-23

H.D. Enterprises II, LLC v. City of Stoughton
that the word, “licenses,” was inadequate notice that the council would reconsider the denial of Pick N’ Save’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14714 - 2005-03-31