Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16401 - 16410 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.

Kris J. Kavelaris v. MSI Insurance Company
(2000). CGLI paid medical expenses to Kavelaris and moved for reimbursement of its subrogated claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3224 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
Tri-County with a notice of claim. He further alleged that Tri-County served him by mail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21

Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
. Lipke alleged that on May 1, 1996, he served Tri-County with a notice of claim. He further alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
motion that claimed his “appellate post-conviction” counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49029 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
Mark recovered on his claim less the amount Jerome recovered on the counterclaim. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103304 - 2013-10-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. Donald Binsfeld appeals a summary judgment dismissing his negligence claims against John P. Mortensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27093 - 2006-11-13

State v. Robert M. Madden
from a postconviction order denying his motion seeking to withdraw his guilty pleas. Madden claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15786 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reduced Mark’s total attorney fee award in proportion to the amount Mark recovered on his claim less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103304 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kevin N. Dornbrook
word against his claimed lack of recollection, that avoiding a trial would spare “re-victimization
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15176 - 2017-09-21

Gregory Thornton v. City of Milwaukee
] because Hodnett was acting within the scope of employment. The City and Hodnett claim that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5648 - 2005-03-31