Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16401 - 16410 of 64954 for or b.
Search results 16401 - 16410 of 64954 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b)4., (3). ¶9 This particular issue is also not one reasonably likely to be repeated yet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194719 - 2017-09-21
)(b)4., (3). ¶9 This particular issue is also not one reasonably likely to be repeated yet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in violation of WIS. STAT. § 48.35(1)(b)1. (1995-96). The “new factor” was that the trial court, and all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28147 - 2014-09-15
in violation of WIS. STAT. § 48.35(1)(b)1. (1995-96). The “new factor” was that the trial court, and all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28147 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
of three years and six months for Class I felonies); and 973.01(2)(b)9., (c), and (d)6. (explaining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103528 - 2013-10-23
of three years and six months for Class I felonies); and 973.01(2)(b)9., (c), and (d)6. (explaining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103528 - 2013-10-23
[PDF]
Clemens V. Hedeen, Jr. v. County of Door
a cross-appeal. Section 809.10(2)(b), STATS. The County did not file a cross-appeal; therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9341 - 2017-09-19
a cross-appeal. Section 809.10(2)(b), STATS. The County did not file a cross-appeal; therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9341 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
[;] (b) Substantial appreciation of the property results from the application.” WIS. STAT. § 766.63(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027567 - 2025-10-22
[;] (b) Substantial appreciation of the property results from the application.” WIS. STAT. § 766.63(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027567 - 2025-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23
from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23
Jerome R. Christensen v. City of Racine Police and Fire Commission
). By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8003 - 2005-03-31
). By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8003 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
came close to being a “golden rule” argument. B. Alleged Appeal to Have the Jury Consider the Best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101649 - 2017-09-21
came close to being a “golden rule” argument. B. Alleged Appeal to Have the Jury Consider the Best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101649 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 28, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
. By the Court.—Order reversed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28240 - 2007-03-08
. By the Court.—Order reversed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28240 - 2007-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS
of the advantages and disadvantages of accepting medication or treatment and the alternatives. b. The individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140986 - 2015-04-29
of the advantages and disadvantages of accepting medication or treatment and the alternatives. b. The individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140986 - 2015-04-29