Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16411 - 16420 of 64216 for records.
Search results 16411 - 16420 of 64216 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181971 - 2017-09-21
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208160 - 2018-02-06
to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208160 - 2018-02-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93566 - 2014-09-15
withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93566 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel J. Voigt
also attempts to challenge his sentence on a companion bail jumping case. We conclude that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14761 - 2005-03-31
also attempts to challenge his sentence on a companion bail jumping case. We conclude that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14761 - 2005-03-31
Leon Coleman v. Dan Buchler
is de novo and is limited to the record created before the committee. State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9167 - 2005-03-31
is de novo and is limited to the record created before the committee. State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9167 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Blaine’s response, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699367 - 2023-09-06
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Blaine’s response, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699367 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Blaine’s response, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699367 - 2023-09-06
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Blaine’s response, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699367 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is for him. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, I conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209859 - 2018-03-13
is for him. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, I conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209859 - 2018-03-13
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, Perren’s response, and counsel’s supplement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135472 - 2015-02-17
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, Perren’s response, and counsel’s supplement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135472 - 2015-02-17
CA Blank Order
, and the record, we conclude that this matter presents an issue of arguable merit. Therefore, we reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101475 - 2013-08-26
, and the record, we conclude that this matter presents an issue of arguable merit. Therefore, we reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101475 - 2013-08-26