Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16421 - 16430 of 61061 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 16421 - 16430 of 61061 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Sandy Pegues
testimony must be preserved to pursue a claim of ineffective assistance. State v. Machner, 92 Wis. 2d 797
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20983 - 2017-09-21
testimony must be preserved to pursue a claim of ineffective assistance. State v. Machner, 92 Wis. 2d 797
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20983 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
children. Wooden claimed that on the date of the offense, she and Herring had attended a party in Chicago
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52534 - 2010-07-27
children. Wooden claimed that on the date of the offense, she and Herring had attended a party in Chicago
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52534 - 2010-07-27
State v. Travis E. Blanks
claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because § 971.05(3), Stats., was not complied with. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because § 971.05(3), Stats., was not complied with. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
. ANALYSIS. Cole claims there were numerous procedural errors. So grave were these irregularities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
. ANALYSIS. Cole claims there were numerous procedural errors. So grave were these irregularities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
Robert J. Maziarka v. Nancy Dolce
appeals a judgment dismissing Robert’s safe-place statute claim against Nancy Dolce.[1] Maziarka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11494 - 2005-03-31
appeals a judgment dismissing Robert’s safe-place statute claim against Nancy Dolce.[1] Maziarka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Vines, Jr. v. Ken Sondalle
was dismissed because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12947 - 2017-09-21
was dismissed because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims in an earlier postconviction motion and failed to provide a sufficient reason for not doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065729 - 2026-01-21
claims in an earlier postconviction motion and failed to provide a sufficient reason for not doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065729 - 2026-01-21
[PDF]
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
He claims he was prejudiced by the erroneous admission of other acts evidence, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21
He claims he was prejudiced by the erroneous admission of other acts evidence, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
He claims he was prejudiced by the erroneous admission of other acts evidence, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14865 - 2017-09-21
He claims he was prejudiced by the erroneous admission of other acts evidence, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14865 - 2017-09-21
Robert Vines, Jr. v. Ken Sondalle
because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
because the officials enjoy immunity from Vines’ claims. We affirm the order. In 1996, Vines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31