Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16421 - 16430 of 20932 for word.
Search results 16421 - 16430 of 20932 for word.
State v. Niko MaShell Triggs
garnered enough valid evidence linking him to the crime. In other words, the deception did not interject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4947 - 2010-07-01
garnered enough valid evidence linking him to the crime. In other words, the deception did not interject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4947 - 2010-07-01
State v. Marquis O. Gilliam
the words and the demeanor of the prospective juror.” Id. at 717. A trial court’s factual finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
the words and the demeanor of the prospective juror.” Id. at 717. A trial court’s factual finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
Beverly Hayen v. Barry Hayen
….” (emphasis added). In interpreting statutory language, the general rule is that the word “shall” is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15558 - 2009-10-27
….” (emphasis added). In interpreting statutory language, the general rule is that the word “shall” is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15558 - 2009-10-27
Patricia M. Klinger v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company
language by failing to restrict reductions to payments made by those who, in the words of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17788 - 2005-05-24
language by failing to restrict reductions to payments made by those who, in the words of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17788 - 2005-05-24
State v. Deonte D. Riley
communications “intercepted in accordance with” the WESCL, or in other words communications intercepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19225 - 2015-07-12
communications “intercepted in accordance with” the WESCL, or in other words communications intercepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19225 - 2015-07-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
explain why she recanted. For another, there was substantial evidence, including Talley’s own words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237354 - 2019-03-19
explain why she recanted. For another, there was substantial evidence, including Talley’s own words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237354 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
State v. Mary E. Schoate
effort. The wording of the written order also indicates this intent. Although it “authorizes” rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12152 - 2017-09-21
effort. The wording of the written order also indicates this intent. Although it “authorizes” rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12152 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contract language is unambiguous, we presume the parties’ intent is evidenced by the words they chose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141770 - 2017-09-21
contract language is unambiguous, we presume the parties’ intent is evidenced by the words they chose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141770 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
….” In other words, facts regarding training or experience go to the credibility of the officer witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15
….” In other words, facts regarding training or experience go to the credibility of the officer witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of 2015. That is about ten months after the hearing that we’re talking about. In other words, no motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147385 - 2015-08-31
of 2015. That is about ten months after the hearing that we’re talking about. In other words, no motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147385 - 2015-08-31