Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16431 - 16440 of 46654 for adult name change.
Search results 16431 - 16440 of 46654 for adult name change.
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Amicus Brief of Forever Wisconsin
for this election cycle. We propose the following revisions to the Law Forward map. These changes would tailor
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224amicusbriefforever.pdf - 2024-01-24
for this election cycle. We propose the following revisions to the Law Forward map. These changes would tailor
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224amicusbriefforever.pdf - 2024-01-24
Fred C. Hageny, Jr. v. Edwin A. Schowalter
to remove the land from forest crop, and they changed the closing date from January 6, 1995 to September 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10543 - 2005-03-31
to remove the land from forest crop, and they changed the closing date from January 6, 1995 to September 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10543 - 2005-03-31
Sydney J. Harris v. Chauncy Steed Harris
In response to Tanner’s objections, Harris’ counsel argued that two conditions had significantly changed since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2606 - 2005-03-31
In response to Tanner’s objections, Harris’ counsel argued that two conditions had significantly changed since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2606 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jesus R.
was deficient because (1) Jesus “does not state how the answers to interrogatories would have changed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11794 - 2005-03-31
was deficient because (1) Jesus “does not state how the answers to interrogatories would have changed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11794 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jesus R.
was deficient because (1) Jesus “does not state how the answers to interrogatories would have changed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11792 - 2005-03-31
was deficient because (1) Jesus “does not state how the answers to interrogatories would have changed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause; and (2) that parole legislation and policy had changed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131916 - 2017-09-21
rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause; and (2) that parole legislation and policy had changed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131916 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 767.59. A child support order may be revised “only upon a finding of a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63393 - 2011-05-02
. Stat. § 767.59. A child support order may be revised “only upon a finding of a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63393 - 2011-05-02
State v. Jesus R.
was deficient because (1) Jesus “does not state how the answers to interrogatories would have changed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11793 - 2005-03-31
was deficient because (1) Jesus “does not state how the answers to interrogatories would have changed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11793 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
Clause; and (2) that parole legislation and policy had changed. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131916 - 2014-12-15
Clause; and (2) that parole legislation and policy had changed. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131916 - 2014-12-15
[PDF]
Sydney J. Harris v. Chauncy Steed Harris
objections, Harris’ counsel argued that two conditions had significantly changed since the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2606 - 2017-09-19
objections, Harris’ counsel argued that two conditions had significantly changed since the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2606 - 2017-09-19