Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16431 - 16440 of 29735 for des.
Search results 16431 - 16440 of 29735 for des.
Julia Cole v. Yvonne L. Hubanks
judgments de novo, using the same method as the circuit court. Sawyer v. Midelfort, 227 Wis. 2d 124, 135
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16629 - 2005-03-31
judgments de novo, using the same method as the circuit court. Sawyer v. Midelfort, 227 Wis. 2d 124, 135
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 144
. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2011-12).6 We review summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104321 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2011-12).6 We review summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104321 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 36
” this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶21. III. DISCUSSION ¶13 Although the circuit court cited multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962250 - 2025-06-25
” this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶21. III. DISCUSSION ¶13 Although the circuit court cited multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962250 - 2025-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the parties regarding the standard of review. They agree that the de novo standard applies to resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261689 - 2020-05-21
the parties regarding the standard of review. They agree that the de novo standard applies to resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261689 - 2020-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald G. Sorenson
requires an interpretation of Wis. Stat. ch. 980. We review statutory interpretation questions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17449 - 2017-09-21
requires an interpretation of Wis. Stat. ch. 980. We review statutory interpretation questions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17449 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 90
a combination of discretionary and de novo review because we review both the trial court’s factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180503 - 2017-09-21
a combination of discretionary and de novo review because we review both the trial court’s factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180503 - 2017-09-21
Westby-Coon Valley State Bank v. Hiram Lund
, and we review its decision de novo. Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 156 Wis.2d 575, 581, 457 N.W.2d 514
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12272 - 2005-03-31
, and we review its decision de novo. Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 156 Wis.2d 575, 581, 457 N.W.2d 514
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12272 - 2005-03-31
Ronald A. Schaefer v. Robert G. Riegelman
review de novo. Gaddis, 198 Wis. 2d 396, 401. ¶21 Section 802.05 provides that "[i]f a pleading
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16411 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Gaddis, 198 Wis. 2d 396, 401. ¶21 Section 802.05 provides that "[i]f a pleading
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is sufficient to support a conviction is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100732 - 2017-09-21
is sufficient to support a conviction is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100732 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jamie L. Pennington
; however, whether a person is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19
; however, whether a person is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19