Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16441 - 16450 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16441 - 16450 of 29823 for des.
2011 WI APP 63
performance was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law which we review de novo, though we will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63073 - 2011-05-25
performance was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law which we review de novo, though we will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63073 - 2011-05-25
Farm Credit Services of North Central Wisconsin v. David Wysocki
, 277 N.W.2d 815 (1979). We review this question of law de novo. Id. We begin our review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17503 - 2005-03-31
, 277 N.W.2d 815 (1979). We review this question of law de novo. Id. We begin our review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17503 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 28
¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77488 - 2014-09-15
¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77488 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Julia Cole v. Yvonne L. Hubanks
not be liable to Cole, as a matter of law. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same method
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16629 - 2017-09-21
not be liable to Cole, as a matter of law. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same method
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Barbara B. v. Dorian H.
conducted a de novo review of the evidence that had been presented to the commissioner. In an oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16798 - 2017-09-21
conducted a de novo review of the evidence that had been presented to the commissioner. In an oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16798 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The determination of counsel’s effectiveness, in contrast, is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186160 - 2017-09-21
). The determination of counsel’s effectiveness, in contrast, is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186160 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 9
interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law that we decide de novo. Severude v. American Fam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479733 - 2022-04-11
interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law that we decide de novo. Severude v. American Fam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479733 - 2022-04-11
[PDF]
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324157 - 2021-01-14
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324157 - 2021-01-14
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Mendoza
is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12303 - 2017-09-21
is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12303 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 63
of law which we review de novo, though we will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63073 - 2014-09-15
of law which we review de novo, though we will uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63073 - 2014-09-15