Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16451 - 16460 of 20941 for word.

State v. James P. Henderson
death or great bodily harm against’ or simply deleted the word ‘intentionally.’” Id., 66 Wis. 2d at 749
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2249 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
statement is, despite lack of the word “incompetent”—is well-supported by the facts of record. ¶19 Two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52989 - 2006-08-29

State v. Keith Schroeder
of no more that 13.9 years.” The investigator’s summary goes on to use the word “Tanner” eight more times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15926 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. In other words, it is one thing for the Commission to set aside its own order when that decision has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114651 - 2014-06-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Initial Brief of Billie Johnson, Chris Goebel, Ed Perkins, Eric O'Keefe, Joe Sanfelippo, Terry Moulton, Robert Jensen, Ron Zahn, Ruth Elmer, and Ruth Streck
” and senate districts must consist of “convenient contiguous territory.” The word “contiguous” is not defined
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1016initialbriefjohnson.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Brief in Support of Petitioners' Proposed Maps
splits. In other words, consistent with the Wisconsin Constitution and the Court’s instruction
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011224briefinsupportpetitioners.pdf - 2024-01-12

[PDF] 2021AP001450 - Memorandum in Support of Motion to Recuse Justice Protasiewicz filed by Wisconsin Legislature, Petitioners, and Congressmen
that the words ‘under God’ in the Pledge of Allegiance were a violation of the separa- tion of church and state
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924supportmemo.pdf - 2024-01-30

[PDF] WI 66
in keeping my word by invalidating 15 This conclusion follows from all the precedents
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713439 - 2023-10-06

[PDF] WI 15
for this statute to override this common law doctrine. I simply do not find any words suggesting that you can
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78661 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 18
the nonexistence of a rule—in other words, that Respondents did nothing more than assert that the DNR cannot act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772722 - 2024-07-02