Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16481 - 16490 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16481 - 16490 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Hamdan, 264 Wis. 2d 433, ¶19; see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81085 - 2014-09-15
of a statute presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Hamdan, 264 Wis. 2d 433, ¶19; see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81085 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 45
interpretation and the application of law to undisputed facts, which we review de novo. State v. Lickes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697507 - 2023-10-11
interpretation and the application of law to undisputed facts, which we review de novo. State v. Lickes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697507 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reliance on the representations was unjustified.2 ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75601 - 2014-09-15
reliance on the representations was unjustified.2 ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75601 - 2014-09-15
WI App 28 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP178 Complete Title of ...
. Stat. § 60.23(29). STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77488 - 2013-04-24
. Stat. § 60.23(29). STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77488 - 2013-04-24
State v. Daniel R. Buttner
” which we review de novo. See State v. Greenwold, 189 Wis.2d 59, 66-67, 525 N.W.2d 294, 296-97 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14077 - 2005-03-31
” which we review de novo. See State v. Greenwold, 189 Wis.2d 59, 66-67, 525 N.W.2d 294, 296-97 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14077 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lisa K. Alberte v. Anew Health Care Services, Inc.
of law that is subject to de novo review by this court. GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. Gisvold, 215 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17179 - 2017-09-21
of law that is subject to de novo review by this court. GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. Gisvold, 215 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17179 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Shannon E. T. v. Alicia M. V.M.
of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶6 The resolution of the motion to dismiss here requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25288 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶6 The resolution of the motion to dismiss here requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation we review de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175518 - 2017-09-21
interpretation we review de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175518 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Julia Cole v. Yvonne L. Hubanks
not be liable to Cole, as a matter of law. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same method
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16629 - 2017-09-21
not be liable to Cole, as a matter of law. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same method
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Madison Metropolitan School District v. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
a de facto expulsion by unlawfully extending a suspension. We see little difference between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7763 - 2017-09-19
a de facto expulsion by unlawfully extending a suspension. We see little difference between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7763 - 2017-09-19