Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16491 - 16500 of 50070 for our.
Search results 16491 - 16500 of 50070 for our.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Christie, 216 Wis. 2d 337, 339-40, 576 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1998). Our review of a prison disciplinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49716 - 2014-09-15
. Christie, 216 Wis. 2d 337, 339-40, 576 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1998). Our review of a prison disciplinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49716 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Darrell D. Johnson
. Nathan concludes that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12221 - 2017-09-21
. Nathan concludes that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12221 - 2017-09-21
State v. Veronica L. Reiter
decision of both the court of appeals and the supreme court. Undoubtedly, the members of our court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9359 - 2005-03-31
decision of both the court of appeals and the supreme court. Undoubtedly, the members of our court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9359 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion.). ¶13 Sentencing is within the discretion of the trial court, and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60261 - 2011-02-22
motion.). ¶13 Sentencing is within the discretion of the trial court, and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60261 - 2011-02-22
CA Blank Order
. Prineas, 2009 WI App 28, ¶34, 316 Wis. 2d 414, 766 N.W.2d 206 (“our inquiry is whether discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132509 - 2014-12-29
. Prineas, 2009 WI App 28, ¶34, 316 Wis. 2d 414, 766 N.W.2d 206 (“our inquiry is whether discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132509 - 2014-12-29
Randall J. Wilson v. The Estate of Elsie L. Woodford
N.W.2d 813, 818 (1980). We do not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court on issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10313 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 813, 818 (1980). We do not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court on issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10313 - 2005-03-31
State v. James H.
to deviate from the percentage standard. ¶7 From our reading of James’s briefs, we deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31
to deviate from the percentage standard. ¶7 From our reading of James’s briefs, we deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 1989). ¶11 Although our decision in Cherry was relatively recent, our reversal was because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42670 - 2014-09-15
. 1989). ¶11 Although our decision in Cherry was relatively recent, our reversal was because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42670 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175379 - 2017-09-21
exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175379 - 2017-09-21