Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16491 - 16500 of 50070 for our.
Search results 16491 - 16500 of 50070 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion.). ¶13 Sentencing is within the discretion of the trial court, and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60261 - 2011-02-22
motion.). ¶13 Sentencing is within the discretion of the trial court, and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60261 - 2011-02-22
CA Blank Order
. Prineas, 2009 WI App 28, ¶34, 316 Wis. 2d 414, 766 N.W.2d 206 (“our inquiry is whether discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132509 - 2014-12-29
. Prineas, 2009 WI App 28, ¶34, 316 Wis. 2d 414, 766 N.W.2d 206 (“our inquiry is whether discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132509 - 2014-12-29
Randall J. Wilson v. The Estate of Elsie L. Woodford
N.W.2d 813, 818 (1980). We do not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court on issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10313 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 813, 818 (1980). We do not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court on issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10313 - 2005-03-31
State v. James H.
to deviate from the percentage standard. ¶7 From our reading of James’s briefs, we deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31
to deviate from the percentage standard. ¶7 From our reading of James’s briefs, we deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 1989). ¶11 Although our decision in Cherry was relatively recent, our reversal was because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42670 - 2014-09-15
. 1989). ¶11 Although our decision in Cherry was relatively recent, our reversal was because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42670 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175379 - 2017-09-21
exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175379 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the grounds phase. ¶8 Under our standard of review, a circuit court’s findings of fact must be given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32404 - 2008-04-14
the grounds phase. ¶8 Under our standard of review, a circuit court’s findings of fact must be given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32404 - 2008-04-14
[PDF]
Malcolm H. v. Marc J. Ackerman
attorney appear pro hac vice on this case. Based on our disposition of the case, however, this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11441 - 2017-09-19
attorney appear pro hac vice on this case. Based on our disposition of the case, however, this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11441 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 1 Wayne uses the phrase, “abused its discretion.” In 1992, our supreme court changed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63381 - 2014-09-15
, 1 Wayne uses the phrase, “abused its discretion.” In 1992, our supreme court changed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63381 - 2014-09-15