Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16491 - 16500 of 75201 for public records.
Search results 16491 - 16500 of 75201 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report, as mandated by Anders. We conclude that, subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631409 - 2023-03-14
independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report, as mandated by Anders. We conclude that, subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631409 - 2023-03-14
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913870 - 2025-02-12
of the no-merit report, and following an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913870 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270034 - 2020-07-22
consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270034 - 2020-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129467 - 2017-09-21
not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert T. Langston
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 1 Upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11319 - 2017-09-19
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 1 Upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11319 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jamie D. Jardine
that cannot be determined from the record before this court. ΒΆ4 In the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3725 - 2005-03-31
that cannot be determined from the record before this court. ΒΆ4 In the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kurt W. Meyer
properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2967 - 2017-09-19
properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2967 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91598 - 2014-09-15
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91598 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Thomas W. Clark District
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95445 - 2014-09-15
Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Thomas W. Clark District
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95445 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109922 - 2014-04-08
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109922 - 2014-04-08