Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16491 - 16500 of 73361 for we.
Search results 16491 - 16500 of 73361 for we.
CA Blank Order
.[1] After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that these cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95257 - 2013-04-07
.[1] After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that these cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95257 - 2013-04-07
State v. Carl F. Hickman
appellate counsel was ineffective. We affirm. ¶2 Hickman entered an Alford plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5076 - 2005-03-31
appellate counsel was ineffective. We affirm. ¶2 Hickman entered an Alford plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5076 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Raymond T. Golden
not to do so. On the basis of the no merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9901 - 2017-09-19
not to do so. On the basis of the no merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9901 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 31
that warrant a sentence modification, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 After serving one year in prison for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211771 - 2018-09-18
that warrant a sentence modification, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 After serving one year in prison for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211771 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
WI App 21
compliance and that the Town had, in fact, substantially complied. Because we conclude that § 66.0404(2)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912715 - 2025-04-21
compliance and that the Town had, in fact, substantially complied. Because we conclude that § 66.0404(2)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912715 - 2025-04-21
[PDF]
WI App 72
immediately prior (Count 2). If so, we must also decide whether the jury instructions on Count 1 accurately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033466 - 2026-01-26
immediately prior (Count 2). If so, we must also decide whether the jury instructions on Count 1 accurately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033466 - 2026-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
without notice. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Following the death of three-year-old Lucas Zietlow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265630 - 2020-06-25
without notice. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Following the death of three-year-old Lucas Zietlow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265630 - 2020-06-25
[PDF]
Frontsheet
for postconviction relief. We reverse. 1 The Honorable Mark F
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608990 - 2023-02-22
for postconviction relief. We reverse. 1 The Honorable Mark F
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608990 - 2023-02-22
[PDF]
WI App 43
unredacted copies of the reports. ¶2 We conclude the police department was permitted to release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167749 - 2017-09-21
unredacted copies of the reports. ¶2 We conclude the police department was permitted to release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167749 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in interest. ¶3 Regarding the circuit court’s determination of the boundary, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684284 - 2023-07-27
in interest. ¶3 Regarding the circuit court’s determination of the boundary, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684284 - 2023-07-27