Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 17421 for Cost.
COURT OF APPEALS
; request for frivolous-appeal costs denied; no costs to either party. ¶1 FINE, J. Electromania
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19
; request for frivolous-appeal costs denied; no costs to either party. ¶1 FINE, J. Electromania
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jenelle Glasbrenner
be ordered to pay the costs of this disciplinary proceeding. ¶2 We conclude that the referee's findings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17883 - 2005-05-02
be ordered to pay the costs of this disciplinary proceeding. ¶2 We conclude that the referee's findings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17883 - 2005-05-02
Frontsheet
be disbarred and that he pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶2 Because no appeal has been filed, we review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49434 - 2010-04-27
be disbarred and that he pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶2 Because no appeal has been filed, we review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49434 - 2010-04-27
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin M. Kelsay
Kelsay should be required to pay the costs of the proceeding. ¶2 Attorney Kelsay was admitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16665 - 2005-03-31
Kelsay should be required to pay the costs of the proceeding. ¶2 Attorney Kelsay was admitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16665 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald J. Harman v.
with prejudice and costs. The multiple grounds for the dismissal included the complaint’s having failed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17255 - 2017-09-21
with prejudice and costs. The multiple grounds for the dismissal included the complaint’s having failed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17255 - 2017-09-21
Dunn County v. Peggy R.
; however the cost would exceed the available funds and is not reasonable given the cost and actual benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7311 - 2005-03-31
; however the cost would exceed the available funds and is not reasonable given the cost and actual benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7311 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert T. Malloy
for professional misconduct. In addition, the referee recommended that Attorney Malloy pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16515 - 2010-11-23
for professional misconduct. In addition, the referee recommended that Attorney Malloy pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16515 - 2010-11-23
The Warehouse II, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
633, ¶48. ¶18 Wisconsin Stat. § 32.28(3)(b) states in relevant part: In lieu of costs under ch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25418 - 2006-06-05
633, ¶48. ¶18 Wisconsin Stat. § 32.28(3)(b) states in relevant part: In lieu of costs under ch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25418 - 2006-06-05
[PDF]
The Warehouse II, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
: In lieu of costs under ch. 814, litigation expenses shall be awarded to the condemnee if: . . . . (b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25418 - 2017-09-21
: In lieu of costs under ch. 814, litigation expenses shall be awarded to the condemnee if: . . . . (b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25418 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a mistrial on the first day of the jury trial; and (4) ordered Prost’s trial counsel to pay costs and fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44321 - 2014-09-15
a mistrial on the first day of the jury trial; and (4) ordered Prost’s trial counsel to pay costs and fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44321 - 2014-09-15