Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 68485 for did.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 68485 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
to exercise our supervisory power to reverse the judgment because the circuit court did not record sidebar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31943 - 2008-02-25
to exercise our supervisory power to reverse the judgment because the circuit court did not record sidebar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31943 - 2008-02-25
Robert Ruffer v. Town of Monroe - Board of Review
of our certiorari review, we consider the dispositive issues to be that Ruffer did not ask the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12505 - 2005-03-31
of our certiorari review, we consider the dispositive issues to be that Ruffer did not ask the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12505 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marion Wilson v. Clarence L. Ogilvie
acres of land she had conveyed to Ogilvie. The trial court found that the parties did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14647 - 2017-09-21
acres of land she had conveyed to Ogilvie. The trial court found that the parties did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14647 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
at the house and arrested Pearson and his accomplice, Jarvis Garrett. Nix testified that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89013 - 2012-11-05
at the house and arrested Pearson and his accomplice, Jarvis Garrett. Nix testified that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89013 - 2012-11-05
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
argues that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3425 - 2005-03-31
argues that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3425 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
argues that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3428 - 2005-03-31
argues that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3428 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
argues that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3426 - 2005-03-31
argues that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3426 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cedric Johnson
, he contends that the trial court's colloquy with him at the plea hearing did not establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10885 - 2005-03-31
, he contends that the trial court's colloquy with him at the plea hearing did not establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10885 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that, if she did not agree, he would have her prosecuted for various crimes and that she would be arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144355 - 2017-09-21
that, if she did not agree, he would have her prosecuted for various crimes and that she would be arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144355 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Garrett. Nix testified that she did not know Pearson. Shacklett and McLaughlin both told the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89013 - 2014-09-15
Garrett. Nix testified that she did not know Pearson. Shacklett and McLaughlin both told the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89013 - 2014-09-15