Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 2641 for hill's.

[PDF] WI 40
2022AP001623-CRNM State v. Joshua T. Immel Denied 9/11/2024 2022AP001633-CR State v. Kenneth Sheldon Hill
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879798 - 2024-11-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
failure to file a reply brief as conceding the State’s arguments. Apple Hill Farms Dev., LLP v. Price
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910071 - 2025-02-04

COURT OF APPEALS
, the defendant would not have pled no contest and would have insisted on going to trial. Hill v. Lockhart, 474
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53821 - 2010-08-30

State v. Johnny W. Williams
counsel’s constitutional ineffective performance affected the outcome of the plea. See Hill v. Lockhart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13208 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard W. Hendrickson
the outcome of a trial. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). ¶14 We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3036 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dings Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
court.” Hill v. LIRC, 184 Wis.2d 101, 109, 516 N.W.2d 441, 445 (Ct. App. 1994) (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13786 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Sheldon Parrett v. Christopher Sudeta
. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 15-16, 546 N.W.2d 151 (1996). A public officer may face liability when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3006 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
[,]” and the Commission’s “expertise in administering cases under the worker’s compensation statutes.” See Hill v. Labor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61578 - 2011-03-21

[PDF] State v. Lee Raven
to the top of a hill and began taking pictures. See id. at 537-38, 436 N.W.2d at 287. When the detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15650 - 2017-09-21

State v. Johnny W. Williams
counsel’s constitutional ineffective performance affected the outcome of the plea. See Hill v. Lockhart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13209 - 2005-03-31