Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 44608 for part.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 44608 for part.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County: ELLIOTT M. LEVINE, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63998 - 2014-09-15
County: ELLIOTT M. LEVINE, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63998 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
HAGEDORN, J., joined. ROGGENSACK, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. REBECCA
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641323 - 2023-06-19
HAGEDORN, J., joined. ROGGENSACK, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. REBECCA
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641323 - 2023-06-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Section Adm 2.07(2) provided in pertinent part: Adm 2.07 Exterior and interior displays and decorations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110457 - 2014-04-16
. Section Adm 2.07(2) provided in pertinent part: Adm 2.07 Exterior and interior displays and decorations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110457 - 2014-04-16
[PDF]
WI 47
. § 703.02(15) as the "part of a condominium intended for any type of independent use, including one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51180 - 2014-09-15
. § 703.02(15) as the "part of a condominium intended for any type of independent use, including one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51180 - 2014-09-15
Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
-part test: (1) whether the proposed variance violates the purpose of the zoning ordinance at issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5370 - 2005-03-31
-part test: (1) whether the proposed variance violates the purpose of the zoning ordinance at issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5370 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Higginbotham, Sherman and Blanchard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83172 - 2014-09-15
. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Higginbotham, Sherman and Blanchard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83172 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
by Wis. Stat. § 703.02(15) as the "part of a condominium intended for any type of independent use
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51180 - 2010-06-17
by Wis. Stat. § 703.02(15) as the "part of a condominium intended for any type of independent use
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51180 - 2010-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), as it existed at the time of the citations. Section ADM 2.07(2) provided in pertinent part: Adm 2.07
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110457 - 2017-09-21
), as it existed at the time of the citations. Section ADM 2.07(2) provided in pertinent part: Adm 2.07
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110457 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
both set forth a two-part test: (1) whether the proposed variance violates the purpose of the zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5370 - 2017-09-19
both set forth a two-part test: (1) whether the proposed variance violates the purpose of the zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5370 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in part as “[p]ass[ing] without objection in the trade under the contract description” and being “fit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833534 - 2024-08-01
in part as “[p]ass[ing] without objection in the trade under the contract description” and being “fit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833534 - 2024-08-01