Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 12959 for prosecuting.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 12959 for prosecuting.
COURT OF APPEALS
prosecution for ‘the same offense’ violates double jeopardy when the cumulative punishments are not intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31303 - 2007-12-26
prosecution for ‘the same offense’ violates double jeopardy when the cumulative punishments are not intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31303 - 2007-12-26
[PDF]
State v. Alan Thomas LaPean
of a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) and from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7386 - 2017-09-20
of a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) and from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7386 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
City of Stevens Point v. Michael C. Wirtz
to grant his motion for a mistrial. He claims the prosecution improperly elicited testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3844 - 2017-09-20
to grant his motion for a mistrial. He claims the prosecution improperly elicited testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3844 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
agreement, the prosecution would recommend “substantial prison” at sentencing.3 At sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242343 - 2019-06-14
agreement, the prosecution would recommend “substantial prison” at sentencing.3 At sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242343 - 2019-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that contributed to the delay. No. 2019AP1-CR 5 ¶14 First and foremost, the State’s prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327034 - 2021-01-27
that contributed to the delay. No. 2019AP1-CR 5 ¶14 First and foremost, the State’s prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327034 - 2021-01-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel vigorously argued to the jury that they should not believe the testimony of the prosecution’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172251 - 2017-09-21
counsel vigorously argued to the jury that they should not believe the testimony of the prosecution’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) to pay others to kill Paulus, who successfully prosecuted a first-degree intentional homicide case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422180 - 2021-09-08
) to pay others to kill Paulus, who successfully prosecuted a first-degree intentional homicide case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422180 - 2021-09-08
State v. Mark R. Lowe
searched the vehicle and found the drugs for which Lowe was prosecuted. ¶9 Lowe was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3907 - 2005-03-31
searched the vehicle and found the drugs for which Lowe was prosecuted. ¶9 Lowe was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3907 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
; the prosecution did not. However, during its case in chief the prosecution called Officer Brown as a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66544 - 2011-06-28
; the prosecution did not. However, during its case in chief the prosecution called Officer Brown as a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66544 - 2011-06-28
State v. Guy N. Giese
the prosecution for the narrow questions asked about the trips. There was no suggestion that Giese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10925 - 2005-03-31
the prosecution for the narrow questions asked about the trips. There was no suggestion that Giese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10925 - 2005-03-31