Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 58285 for speedy trial.
City of Pewaukee v. Thomas L. Carter
Gempeler, Judge.[1] The circuit court denied the City of Pewaukee's request for a new trial and dismissed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16780 - 2005-03-31
Gempeler, Judge.[1] The circuit court denied the City of Pewaukee's request for a new trial and dismissed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16780 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion seeking a new trial. Cooper argues that he is entitled to a new trial for two reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175679 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion seeking a new trial. Cooper argues that he is entitled to a new trial for two reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175679 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. Mason argues that he is entitled to a new trial because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251667 - 2019-12-27
his motion for postconviction relief. Mason argues that he is entitled to a new trial because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251667 - 2019-12-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his request for a new trial. James contends that he received ineffective No. 2013AP2409-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117316 - 2017-09-21
his request for a new trial. James contends that he received ineffective No. 2013AP2409-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117316 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
sexual assault of a child and from a postconviction order denying his request for a new trial. James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117316 - 2014-07-22
sexual assault of a child and from a postconviction order denying his request for a new trial. James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117316 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶1 BRENNAN, J.1 Luis G., the father of Jenalyn G., appeals both the trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47225 - 2014-09-15
¶1 BRENNAN, J.1 Luis G., the father of Jenalyn G., appeals both the trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47225 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
BRENNAN, J.[1] Luis G., the father of Jenalyn G., appeals both the trial court’s judgment, terminating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47225 - 2010-02-18
BRENNAN, J.[1] Luis G., the father of Jenalyn G., appeals both the trial court’s judgment, terminating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47225 - 2010-02-18
[PDF]
State v. Raymond F. Gose
denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred when it NO. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10526 - 2017-09-20
denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred when it NO. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10526 - 2017-09-20
State v. Raymond F. Gose
motion. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a new trial after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10526 - 2005-03-31
motion. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a new trial after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10526 - 2005-03-31
County of Bayfield v. Andrew J. Peterson
are: (1) whether the trial court erred at Peterson's initial appearance when it failed to inform Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9962 - 2005-03-31
are: (1) whether the trial court erred at Peterson's initial appearance when it failed to inform Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9962 - 2005-03-31