Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 1651 - 1660 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Barron County v. Janet S.
motion for a new fact-finding trial. She argues that she is entitled to a new trial, a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2625 - 2017-09-19
motion for a new fact-finding trial. She argues that she is entitled to a new trial, a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2625 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the Perlewitzes challenge a pretrial decision by the trial court to proceed with a bench trial, despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935377 - 2025-04-01
, the Perlewitzes challenge a pretrial decision by the trial court to proceed with a bench trial, despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935377 - 2025-04-01
[PDF]
State v. Gregory L. Schroeder
, and misdemeanor damage to property. Schroeder claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13026 - 2017-09-21
, and misdemeanor damage to property. Schroeder claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13026 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Rucker Detective Agency
former employee, Joe Moss, following a trial to the court. Rucker also appeals from an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12924 - 2017-09-21
former employee, Joe Moss, following a trial to the court. Rucker also appeals from an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12924 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rucker Detective Agency
entered in favor of Rucker’s former employee, Joe Moss, following a trial to the court. Rucker also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12924 - 2014-02-05
entered in favor of Rucker’s former employee, Joe Moss, following a trial to the court. Rucker also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12924 - 2014-02-05
City of Pewaukee v. Thomas L. Carter
Gempeler, Judge.[1] The circuit court denied the City of Pewaukee's request for a new trial and dismissed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16780 - 2005-03-31
Gempeler, Judge.[1] The circuit court denied the City of Pewaukee's request for a new trial and dismissed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16780 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Pewaukee v. Thomas L. Carter
, Mark Gempeler, Judge. 1 The circuit court denied the City of Pewaukee's request for a new trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16780 - 2017-09-21
, Mark Gempeler, Judge. 1 The circuit court denied the City of Pewaukee's request for a new trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16780 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion seeking a new trial. Cooper argues that he is entitled to a new trial for two reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175679 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion seeking a new trial. Cooper argues that he is entitled to a new trial for two reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175679 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. Mason argues that he is entitled to a new trial because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251667 - 2019-12-27
his motion for postconviction relief. Mason argues that he is entitled to a new trial because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251667 - 2019-12-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his request for a new trial. James contends that he received ineffective No. 2013AP2409-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117316 - 2017-09-21
his request for a new trial. James contends that he received ineffective No. 2013AP2409-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117316 - 2017-09-21