Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16501 - 16510 of 59146 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 West’s claims are barred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365227 - 2021-05-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that Lelinski’s claim was procedurally barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197490 - 2017-10-10

COURT OF APPEALS
conduct”—and instead raised “frivolous ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims.”[1] ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128640 - 2014-11-17

State v. Paul M. Nigl
of an erroneous exercise of discretion. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6220 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
there would be arguable merit to a claim that Witz’s trial lawyer was constitutionally ineffective. Witz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105735 - 2013-12-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bell’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30

[PDF] A T Polishing Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
work effective November 6, 1996, due to asthma. Bosco claimed that he was totally disabled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2235 - 2017-09-19

State v. Floyd A. Worth
Wis.2d 797, 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979), with respect to his claim that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13191 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
that, in part, rejected their claim of adverse possession against owners of No. 2005AP1801 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26848 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Javier Salgado
claims: (1) that the 1 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2754 - 2017-09-19