Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16501 - 16510 of 83454 for case code.
Search results 16501 - 16510 of 83454 for case code.
Gerald Breen v. David J. Winkel
and procedural facts is particularly helpful in this case. The Breens operated a retail bath boutique
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9740 - 2013-03-26
and procedural facts is particularly helpful in this case. The Breens operated a retail bath boutique
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9740 - 2013-03-26
State v. Earl L. Diehl
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9627 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9627 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Edward T.
-finding hearing was excused by good cause. Therefore, we affirm. Because we decide this case based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21562 - 2017-09-21
-finding hearing was excused by good cause. Therefore, we affirm. Because we decide this case based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21562 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward T.
by good cause. Therefore, we affirm. Because we decide this case based on good cause, we do not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21562 - 2006-02-27
by good cause. Therefore, we affirm. Because we decide this case based on good cause, we do not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21562 - 2006-02-27
State v. Earl L. Diehl
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9626 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9626 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rules Petition 05-03
with the investigation or prosecution of a case. SCR 72.01(46), however, requires the clerk to retain criminal case
/supreme/docs/0503petition.pdf - 2010-01-20
with the investigation or prosecution of a case. SCR 72.01(46), however, requires the clerk to retain criminal case
/supreme/docs/0503petition.pdf - 2010-01-20
[PDF]
Oral Argument Schedule - February 2022
Pursuant to Rule 809.22, you are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=469199 - 2021-12-30
Pursuant to Rule 809.22, you are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=469199 - 2021-12-30
[PDF]
Oral Argument Schedule - December 2012
that the following cases will be called for argument on the days stated. The calendar indicates that you
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89571 - 2014-09-15
that the following cases will be called for argument on the days stated. The calendar indicates that you
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89571 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Schedule - November 2018
Pursuant to Rule 809.22, you are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218611 - 2018-08-31
Pursuant to Rule 809.22, you are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218611 - 2018-08-31
[PDF]
WI 41
. No. 2024AP1511-D Decided August 15, 2025 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING ΒΆ1 PER CURIAM. This case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997973 - 2025-08-15
. No. 2024AP1511-D Decided August 15, 2025 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING ΒΆ1 PER CURIAM. This case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997973 - 2025-08-15