Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16501 - 16510 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16501 - 16510 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
WI App 73
is based on the circuit court’s resolution of questions of law, we review those legal rulings de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029169 - 2026-01-26
is based on the circuit court’s resolution of questions of law, we review those legal rulings de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029169 - 2026-01-26
[PDF]
WI 43
is understandable, but his leniency is misplaced. . . . A de novo review of that No. 2007AP187-D 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36731 - 2014-09-15
is understandable, but his leniency is misplaced. . . . A de novo review of that No. 2007AP187-D 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36731 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis. 2d 656, 664, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196833 - 2017-09-26
is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis. 2d 656, 664, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196833 - 2017-09-26
[PDF]
WI APP 93
correct legal theories are questions of law we review de novo. See Sliwinski, 289 Wis. 2d 422, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179028 - 2017-09-21
correct legal theories are questions of law we review de novo. See Sliwinski, 289 Wis. 2d 422, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179028 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324157 - 2021-01-14
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324157 - 2021-01-14
[PDF]
WI APP 18
of review ¶7 Interpretation of WIS. STAT. ch. 785 is a question of law that we review de novo. Rosario
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31615 - 2014-09-15
of review ¶7 Interpretation of WIS. STAT. ch. 785 is a question of law that we review de novo. Rosario
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31615 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 34
the constitutional standard presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Doss, 2008 WI 93, ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47324 - 2011-02-07
the constitutional standard presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Doss, 2008 WI 93, ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47324 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assessment, and confirming the special assessment. The District appeals. DISCUSSION ¶15 “We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90209 - 2014-09-15
assessment, and confirming the special assessment. The District appeals. DISCUSSION ¶15 “We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90209 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Burgess
review de novo. State v. Webster, 196 Wis. 2d 308, 316, 538 N.W.2d 810 (Ct. App. 1995). Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3258 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Webster, 196 Wis. 2d 308, 316, 538 N.W.2d 810 (Ct. App. 1995). Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3258 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 75
judgment is a question of law we review de novo, applying the same standards used by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96041 - 2014-09-15
judgment is a question of law we review de novo, applying the same standards used by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96041 - 2014-09-15