Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16501 - 16510 of 29823 for des.

State v. John A. Lettice
double jeopardy protections apply is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Kramsvogel, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13425 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Julia Cole v. Yvonne L. Hubanks
not be liable to Cole, as a matter of law. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same method
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16629 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional principles to those facts. Such a review presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220428 - 2018-10-04

[PDF] State v. Jeremy P.
¶5 The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7296 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Jamie L. Pennington
; however, whether a person is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 36
. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s summary-judgment rulings, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78323 - 2014-09-15

State v. Richard L. Bowers
of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Howard, 2001 WI App 137, ¶15, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7476 - 2005-05-09

WI App 104 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1852-CR Complete Titl...
under the clearly erroneous standard and then review de novo the application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85613 - 2012-09-26

Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins
, and therefore presents a question of law which we decide de novo. See Stockbridge Sch. Dist. v. DPI, 202 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12941 - 2005-03-31

Westby-Coon Valley State Bank v. Hiram Lund
, and we review its decision de novo. Grosskopf Oil, Inc. v. Winter, 156 Wis.2d 575, 581, 457 N.W.2d 514
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12272 - 2005-03-31