Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16501 - 16510 of 68276 for did.
Search results 16501 - 16510 of 68276 for did.
Village of Walworth v. Stephen F. Meyer
that the police had probable cause to arrest because it did not present any objective proof as to the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13548 - 2005-03-31
that the police had probable cause to arrest because it did not present any objective proof as to the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13548 - 2005-03-31
City of Wauwatosa v. William J. Morgan
jurisdictional defects under § 800.01(2)(b), Stats.: that the citations did not contain a statement of personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13540 - 2005-03-31
jurisdictional defects under § 800.01(2)(b), Stats.: that the citations did not contain a statement of personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13540 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Because we conclude that the circuit court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Mitchell was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34862 - 2014-09-15
. Because we conclude that the circuit court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Mitchell was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34862 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the initial hearing on M.R.B.’s petitions. S.S. did not appear in person or by counsel. ¶4 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197396 - 2017-10-05
the initial hearing on M.R.B.’s petitions. S.S. did not appear in person or by counsel. ¶4 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197396 - 2017-10-05
[PDF]
WI APP 7
, the prosecutor did not present articulable facts supporting a reasonable suspicion that the rear window failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44952 - 2014-09-15
, the prosecutor did not present articulable facts supporting a reasonable suspicion that the rear window failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44952 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
of the jury. We conclude that the circuit court did not err when it declined to remove juror E.S. for cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28374 - 2007-03-20
of the jury. We conclude that the circuit court did not err when it declined to remove juror E.S. for cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28374 - 2007-03-20
COURT OF APPEALS
with her. During these assaults, Wells also twice bit the victim’s nipple. When asked why she did not run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80965 - 2012-04-16
with her. During these assaults, Wells also twice bit the victim’s nipple. When asked why she did not run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80965 - 2012-04-16
State v. Frederick N.
you in default and will move on with the case.” ¶3 Mr. N. did not personally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5128 - 2005-03-31
you in default and will move on with the case.” ¶3 Mr. N. did not personally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5128 - 2005-03-31
Village of Waterford v. Kurt J. Doerr
intoxicated. Doerr requested a refusal hearing. The grounds were that the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13708 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated. Doerr requested a refusal hearing. The grounds were that the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13708 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, at which she indicated that she did not intend to file an answer, Attorney Semancik has not participated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137812 - 2015-03-17
, at which she indicated that she did not intend to file an answer, Attorney Semancik has not participated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137812 - 2015-03-17