Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16511 - 16520 of 64736 for b's.
Search results 16511 - 16520 of 64736 for b's.
[PDF]
Josephine Artac v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
or such individual’s spouse, (B) by a person, including a court or administrative body, with legal authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15626 - 2017-09-21
or such individual’s spouse, (B) by a person, including a court or administrative body, with legal authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15626 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jeffrey Allen v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
a variance. See WAUKESHA COUNTY, WIS., ORDINANCE, APPENDIX B—SHORELAND, FLOODLAND PROTECTION ORDINANCE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11666 - 2017-09-19
a variance. See WAUKESHA COUNTY, WIS., ORDINANCE, APPENDIX B—SHORELAND, FLOODLAND PROTECTION ORDINANCE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11666 - 2017-09-19
State v. Timothy Shawn Mann
, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)1 and 961.49(1)(b)6 (1999-2000), and one count of bail jumping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4825 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)1 and 961.49(1)(b)6 (1999-2000), and one count of bail jumping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4825 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that he did not believe he was in contempt “[b]ecause when [he] looked at the history of [his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145386 - 2015-07-30
testified that he did not believe he was in contempt “[b]ecause when [he] looked at the history of [his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145386 - 2015-07-30
State v. Shane M. Cook
in subs. (2) and (3), the defendant shall be present: (a) At the arraignment; (b) At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4158 - 2005-03-31
in subs. (2) and (3), the defendant shall be present: (a) At the arraignment; (b) At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Walworth v. Ryan S. Wood
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (1997-98). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16010 - 2017-09-21
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (1997-98). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16010 - 2017-09-21
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Daniel J. Raymonds
: ATTORNEYS: For the complainant-appellant there were briefs by Gene B. Radcliffe, Black River Falls
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17266 - 2005-03-31
: ATTORNEYS: For the complainant-appellant there were briefs by Gene B. Radcliffe, Black River Falls
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17266 - 2005-03-31
Rene Faye Zastrow v. Neal Alan Zastrow
appearances. B. Reasonableness ¶27 Kost was in Forest County, where a three-day jury trial had extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7292 - 2005-03-31
appearances. B. Reasonableness ¶27 Kost was in Forest County, where a three-day jury trial had extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7292 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental relationship” means the acceptance and exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73881 - 2011-11-14
with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental relationship” means the acceptance and exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73881 - 2011-11-14
2010 WI APP 95
§ 51.30(1)(b). ¶20 The Wisconsin Supreme Court, in Watton v. Hegerty, 2008 WI 74, ¶22, 311 Wis. 2d 52
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50839 - 2011-08-21
§ 51.30(1)(b). ¶20 The Wisconsin Supreme Court, in Watton v. Hegerty, 2008 WI 74, ¶22, 311 Wis. 2d 52
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50839 - 2011-08-21