Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16511 - 16520 of 98407 for court records search online.
Search results 16511 - 16520 of 98407 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record, an appellate court can nevertheless affirm, if the record indicates that balancing is implicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116722 - 2017-09-21
on the record, an appellate court can nevertheless affirm, if the record indicates that balancing is implicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116722 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 24, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557096 - 2022-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 24, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557096 - 2022-08-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 8, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212232 - 2018-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 8, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212232 - 2018-05-08
State v. Cynthia S.
in the record.” This court affirms. I. Background ¶2 The relevant facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5881 - 2005-03-31
in the record.” This court affirms. I. Background ¶2 The relevant facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5881 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cynthia S.
where … no searching inquiry appears in the record.” This court affirms. I. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5881 - 2017-09-19
where … no searching inquiry appears in the record.” This court affirms. I. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5881 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Janice Renee Maxwell v. Jody Justin Maxwell
result. Id. As a reviewing court, our task is to search the record for reasons to sustain the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5460 - 2017-09-19
result. Id. As a reviewing court, our task is to search the record for reasons to sustain the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5460 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
its decision on the record, this court will “independently review the record to determine whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592322 - 2022-11-23
its decision on the record, this court will “independently review the record to determine whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592322 - 2022-11-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742154 - 2023-12-19
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742154 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742154 - 2023-12-19
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742154 - 2023-12-19
State v. James Randall
of public record, and that it was not within the “exclusive” control of the State. Further, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7846 - 2005-03-31
of public record, and that it was not within the “exclusive” control of the State. Further, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7846 - 2005-03-31