Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16511 - 16520 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. Parrish C. Payne
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. If a motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12467 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
a question of law that we consider de novo, without deference to the decision of the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75106 - 2012-01-02

[PDF] State v. Jorge B. Sostre
, 396, 338 N.W.2d 461 (1983). This court reviews such question de novo without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16904 - 2017-09-21

State v. Brian P. Sullivan
). This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310. If the motion meets this standard, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
present questions of law we review de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶¶9, 16, 331 Wis. 2d 640
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077834 - 2026-02-18

[PDF] State v. Royce Minnich
was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13668 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
credit pursuant to that statute is a question of law we review de novo, see State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122265 - 2014-09-23

WI App 58 Court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1035-CR Complete Title...
de novo. See id., ¶8. As we presume statutes are constitutional, a party attempting to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80525 - 2012-05-30

COURT OF APPEALS
, on the other hand, is a question of law, which we review de novo. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135731 - 2015-02-25

Chromium Industries, Inc. v. Milwaukee Boiler Manufacturing Company
de novo. Id. The replevin bond issued by Hartford is a conditional, penal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9648 - 2005-03-31