Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16511 - 16520 of 34007 for dismissal.

State v. Jose M. Jaimes
, Jaimes moved for dismissal of the two deliveries of cocaine charges on double jeopardy grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24796 - 2006-05-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
trafficking—both as repeaters—the remaining two counts of trafficking of a child would be dismissed but read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227510 - 2018-11-20

[PDF] WI APP 137
the requested documents were released. The trial court dismissed the Newspaper’s complaint after concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71495 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Clara Farr v. Alternative Living Services, Inc.
an order which dismissed her second amended complaint against Alternative Living Services, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3826 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Town of La Grange v. Robert J. Auchinleck
of LaGrange appeals from a trial court order dismissing its action against Robert J. Auchinleck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11719 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Antwan D. Robinson
of false imprisonment, counts one, two, six and seven, in exchange for the State moving to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21138 - 2017-09-21

Darrent Britt v. Jane Gamble
, dismissing his action and remanding him to the custody of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections (DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4896 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammy L.W.
of unfitness shall not, however, preclude the dismissal of a petition under Wis. Stat. § 48.427(2). “The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3590 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
-1998 2 judgment and dismissing West Bend from the action. The circuit court concluded that two
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17135 - 2017-09-21

State v. Garrett Ely
, that is a violation of s. 940.02 or 940.05,” is unconstitutionally vague and, thus, requires dismissal of his charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14129 - 2005-03-31