Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16521 - 16530 of 30081 for de.

State v. Crystal Harrell
)(a) and (2)(g). Statutory interpretation is a question of law which we review de novo. See Rolo v. Goers
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16919 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jorge B. Sostre
, 396, 338 N.W.2d 461 (1983). This court reviews such question de novo without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16904 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
present questions of law we review de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶¶9, 16, 331 Wis. 2d 640
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077834 - 2026-02-18

WI App 58 Court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1035-CR Complete Title...
de novo. See id., ¶8. As we presume statutes are constitutional, a party attempting to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80525 - 2012-05-30

Circuit Court Administrative Districts
= Vel Phillips Youth & Family Justice Center De La Rosa, Amy L. - Reporter Rm 506 SB (414) 278-4133
/contact/CC_Admin_Dists.html - 2026-02-18

State v. Martin J. Applebee
the appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Behnke, 203 Wis. 2d 43, 62, 553 N.W.2d 265 (Ct. App. 1996). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3349 - 2005-03-31

2008 WI APP 112
a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Old Tuckaway Assocs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33061 - 2008-07-29

Gerald G. Geyso v. Richard Daly
its decision de novo. Greenlee v. Rainbow Auction/Realty Co., 202 Wis. 2d 653, 662, 553 N.W.2d 257
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7384 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. State v. Delap, 2018 WI 64, ¶¶27-28, 382 Wis. 2d 92, 913 N.W.2d 175. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842957 - 2024-08-28

COURT OF APPEALS
review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Yahnke v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66695 - 2011-06-27