Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16521 - 16530 of 73361 for we.
Search results 16521 - 16530 of 73361 for we.
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion without holding a hearing. Because we conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33521 - 2008-07-28
his postconviction motion without holding a hearing. Because we conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33521 - 2008-07-28
State v. James D. Curtis
constitutional rights against compelled self-incrimination and double jeopardy. We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11094 - 2005-03-31
constitutional rights against compelled self-incrimination and double jeopardy. We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
denied his motion to suppress. We conclude VanDinter was seized without reasonable suspicion, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36656 - 2014-09-15
denied his motion to suppress. We conclude VanDinter was seized without reasonable suspicion, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36656 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
be with her. We conclude that Rose has not established a substantial change in circumstances, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35734 - 2014-09-15
be with her. We conclude that Rose has not established a substantial change in circumstances, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35734 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the imposed sentence for 30 days.2 Due to significant deficiencies in Dorin’s briefing, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006506 - 2025-09-10
of the imposed sentence for 30 days.2 Due to significant deficiencies in Dorin’s briefing, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006506 - 2025-09-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2022AP1554 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
2022AP1554 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
-approved stipulation. We affirm for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2 Lowrey and Magnuson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39334 - 2014-09-15
-approved stipulation. We affirm for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2 Lowrey and Magnuson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39334 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jarrell E. Hurley
for sentence modification. We agree with the circuit court that it did not impose an illegal sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18691 - 2005-06-28
for sentence modification. We agree with the circuit court that it did not impose an illegal sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18691 - 2005-06-28
[PDF]
State v. Ralph E. Peat
to a scale. We conclude that an inspector with the Wisconsin State Patrol had probable cause to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13141 - 2017-09-21
to a scale. We conclude that an inspector with the Wisconsin State Patrol had probable cause to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13141 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to suppress. We disagree with Plautz and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 Officer Josh Pudlowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34187 - 2014-09-15
to suppress. We disagree with Plautz and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 Officer Josh Pudlowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34187 - 2014-09-15