Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16531 - 16540 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 16531 - 16540 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to pay the D.N.A. surcharge given the nature of this offense. Given the prior record I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65050 - 2014-09-15
to pay the D.N.A. surcharge given the nature of this offense. Given the prior record I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65050 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to pay the D.N.A. surcharge given the nature of this offense. Given the prior record I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65050 - 2011-05-31
to pay the D.N.A. surcharge given the nature of this offense. Given the prior record I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65050 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
its restitution order, the restitution hearing was not included in the circuit court record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204484 - 2017-11-30
its restitution order, the restitution hearing was not included in the circuit court record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204484 - 2017-11-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP1574-CRNM 2 independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523326 - 2022-05-24
. No. 2021AP1574-CRNM 2 independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523326 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91053 - 2014-09-15
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91053 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David Burba
the record, however, we are satisfied that (1) the initial sentencing court adequately explained its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5281 - 2017-09-19
the record, however, we are satisfied that (1) the initial sentencing court adequately explained its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5281 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Medina’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250319 - 2019-11-20
2 After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Medina’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250319 - 2019-11-20
[PDF]
State v. Roger E. Smiley
that he could respond to the report, but he has not done so. After an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13637 - 2017-09-21
that he could respond to the report, but he has not done so. After an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13637 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an order denying Moua’s postconviction motion. After this court’s initial review of the record disclosed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98495 - 2014-09-15
an order denying Moua’s postconviction motion. After this court’s initial review of the record disclosed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98495 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael Hill
problematic. No. 96-1357-CR-NM -2- After an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10821 - 2017-09-20
problematic. No. 96-1357-CR-NM -2- After an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10821 - 2017-09-20