Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16541 - 16550 of 64560 for b's.

COURT OF APPEALS
/recall: $167,000; (b) labor/testing costs: $41,000; (c) lost profits: $367,000. Given the shared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95352 - 2013-04-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County: MARSHALL B. MURRAY, Judge.1 Affirmed. ¶1 CURLEY, P.J.2 Beverly H. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66203 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
assault of a child under thirteen years of age contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 948.02(1) and 939.50(3)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45543 - 2014-09-15

State v. Alonzo R.
weight of the credible evidence, pursuant to § 767.51(5)(b), Stats., to establish current support under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14802 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Timothy Shawn Mann
, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)1 and 961.49(1)(b)6 (1999-2000), and No. 02-0097-CR 2 one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4825 - 2017-09-19

Industry to Industry, Inc. v. Hillsman Modular Molding, Inc.
" in § 134.93(1)(b), includes a corporation. Based on the unambiguous language of the statute, the common
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16412 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of unnecessary defensive force (imperfect self-defense) under WIS. STAT. § 940.01(2)(b) (“Unnecessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242863 - 2019-06-27

Josephine Artac v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
– (A) by the individual or such individual’s spouse, (B) by a person, including a court or administrative body
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15626 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
capacity to appraise personal conduct” is “presumed incapable of consent[,]” see § 940.225(4)(b).4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286276 - 2020-09-10

G. Curt Borgwardt v. Ralph Redlin
) (interpreting the federal analogue to Rule 804.01(2)(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)). Moreover, the “litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8179 - 2005-03-31