Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16551 - 16560 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16551 - 16560 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Donald Murtaugh v. State
summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6124 - 2017-09-19
summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6124 - 2017-09-19
Lilie-Jean Awsumb v. David A. Thompson
reviews de novo. Spencer v. Spencer, 140 Wis. 2d 447, 450, 410 N.W.2d 629 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7312 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. Spencer v. Spencer, 140 Wis. 2d 447, 450, 410 N.W.2d 629 (Ct. App. 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7312 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald C. Foust
to undisputed facts. It is thus a question of law, which we decide de novo. State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12105 - 2014-09-15
to undisputed facts. It is thus a question of law, which we decide de novo. State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12105 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“a reasonable conclusion using a demonstrated rational process.” Id. We review de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180526 - 2017-09-21
“a reasonable conclusion using a demonstrated rational process.” Id. We review de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180526 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
OF REVIEW ¶13 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31678 - 2014-09-15
OF REVIEW ¶13 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31678 - 2014-09-15
State v. Alfredo Vega
and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990). Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9845 - 2005-03-31
and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990). Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9845 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 595 N.W.2d 39 (Ct. App. 1999). We determine de novo whether the EAB acted within its jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112768 - 2014-05-21
, 595 N.W.2d 39 (Ct. App. 1999). We determine de novo whether the EAB acted within its jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112768 - 2014-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Jade Lamont Cosby
relied upon in the sentencing-after-revocation memorandum were de minimis. Cosby claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4319 - 2017-09-19
relied upon in the sentencing-after-revocation memorandum were de minimis. Cosby claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4319 - 2017-09-19
S.J.A.J. v. First Things First
the lawsuit. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15194 - 2005-03-31
the lawsuit. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15194 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christa Brojanac
the motion did not preside at the jury trial, we start from scratch and examine the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2963 - 2017-09-19
the motion did not preside at the jury trial, we start from scratch and examine the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2963 - 2017-09-19